Legal Opinion

Deloach v. Automatic Transmission & Brake Shop, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 26, 1962No. 39736PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge.

The basic question to be decided is whether the trial court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The plaintiff based her action upon Code § 12-104, which provides that in all cases of bailment, after proof of loss, the burden of proof is on the bailee to prove proper diligence. This statute has been applied in several cases and interpreted as meaning that after the bailor proves the bailment and that there was loss to the property bailed, the burden is then placed upon the bailee to show that he exercised proper diligence according to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. DavieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Department of Revenue v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Johnson v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Pickering v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Security Warehouse, Inc. v. Tasty Sandwich Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Rhodes v. DuarteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Ammari v. SohnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API