Legal Opinion

McCrossen v. Stoyka

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1969No. 3334PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GARDINER, Judge.

Plaintiff filed suit against the parents1 of three minor boys to recover $317.50, the value of a motorbike the youths allegedly misappropriated, misused and ultimately demolished.

Defendants answered denying liability. Defendant, Louis W. Stoyka, alleged t.hat he was merely the stepfather of one of the minors and, therefore, is not responsible for any damages suffered by plaintiff. He then reconvened to recover $1,000.00 as damages for what he styled “abuse of process.” Plaintiff answered his reconven-tional demand denying liability.

The First Parish Court for the Parish of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toca v. RojasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Cox v. Shreveport Packing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  3. Rush v. Town of FarmervilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Sharp v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Skelly v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greene v. GreeneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API