Legal Opinion

Hill v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 24, 1923No. 3141PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

On a former writ of error this court reversed a conviction of plaintiff in error under counts 4 and 5 of an indictment (Hill, etc., v. U. S., 275 Fed. 187); count 4 there involved being the same count 4 under which plaintiff in error, here called defendant, was again convicted in 1921. That conviction is here for review.

The count charges that defendant did feloniously, etc., publish, utter, and pass as true a spurious circulating bank note. The first objection raised is that the count does not sufficiently set out nor describe the $1 note said to have been altered. We are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zacharie v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Hill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maricopa County v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. BeckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Smith v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  4. McGrady v. Munsey Trust Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Roberts v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API