Legal Opinion

Arochem Corporation v. Wilomi, Inc., A/K/A Willomi, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1992No. 91-2827PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:

To insure payment for its carriage of crude oil from Scotland to Puerto Rico, Wilomi, Inc. arrested the oil subsequent to its delivery. Arochem Corp., appellant, which had purchased the oil, claimed the arrest was wrongful because Wilomi’s lien was no longer valid. Arochem brought suit seeking damages for the allegedly wrongful arrest. Holding that the arrest was not wrongful because a valid lien existed, the district court granted summary judgment for Wilomi.

I. FACTS

On September 1, 1988, Marimpex Mineraloel-Handelsgesellschaft MBH & Co., KG (“Marimpex”)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. The EddySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Bruce A. Bailey, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Joseph Roman Buenaflor, Deceased v. Dolphin International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. The Bird of ParadiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. 4,885 Bags of LinseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1861

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cherokee Pump & Equipment Inc. v. Aurora PumpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MassingillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Chembulk Trading LLC v. Chemex Ltd., Novorossiysk Shipping Company v. Chemex Ltd., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. Liverpool & London Steamship Protection & Indemnity Ass'n v. QUEEN OF LEMAN MVCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Comar Marine, Corp. v. Raider Marine Logistics, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API