Legal Opinion

Paiz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1959No. 30321PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is theft by false pretext, a felony; the punishment, 2 years.

One Antonio Arias held title to a certain house and lot in San Antonio and, desirous of selling his equity therein, spoke to the appellant, who was in the real estate business operating under the names of “Paiz & Associates” and “Manuel T. Paiz & Associates.” At this time, he explained to the appellant that the Bernard Lumber Company had built the house for him, that he not only had not paid for the same, but was one or two months delinquent in his payments.

Shortly after this, Mr. and Mrs.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wimer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Lieske v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Hesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. McElroy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  3. Mitchell Mark Orr v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992
  4. McElroy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API