Legal Opinion

Sugrim v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Jaggernauth Sugrim appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated February 20, 2009, as granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover damages based upon a manufacturing defect and failure to warn, and the defendants cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Liriano v. Hobart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Caprara v. Chrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Banks v. Makita, U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fahey v. A.O. Smith CorpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Parker v. Raymond Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Shamir v. Extrema Mach. Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Andrade v. T.C. Dunham Paint Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Andrade v. T.C. Dunham Paint Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API