Legal Opinion

COTE v. SCHNELL INDUSTRIES

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 2021No. 4:18-cv-01440Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAYTON COTE, No. 4:18-CV-01440 Plaintiff, (Chief Judge Brann) v. U.S. SILICA COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, SCHNELL INDUSTRIES, and FB INDUSTRIES, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION NOVEMBER 16, 2021 In February 2016, Dayton Cote nearly lost his hand while operating a large, industrial machine used to transport frac sand. After the accident, Cote filed suit against four defendants: (1) Schnell Industries, the manufacturer of the machine; (2) FB Industries, Schnell’s exclusive distributor in North America and the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Dorothy Daniels v. Philadelphia School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API