Legal Opinion
Feldman v. Aunstrup
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 19, 1975No. Patent Appeal No. 74-602PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This appeal by Feldman (junior party) is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to Aunstrup (senior party). *1352The issues centers around Aunstrup’s specification, which refers to a microorganism culture deposited in a foreign country, and the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. Hence, this case is a sequel to In re Argoudelis, 434 F.2d 1390, 58 C.C.P.A. 769 (1970). The board held that Aunstrup’s specification satisfies § 112, first paragraph, and we affirm.
The Subject Matter
The sole count…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re GlassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Application of Alexander D. Argoudelis, Clarence De Boer, Thomas E. Eble and Ross R. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- In re HawkinsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
3Cited by7 opinions
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- In Re Jack R. Wands, Vincent R. Zurawski, Jr., and Hubert J.P. SchoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In Re Robert L. LundakCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Novo Industri A/s v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Gb Fermentation Industries, Inc., and Gist-Brocades, N.V.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Evans Medical Ltd. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.