Legal Opinion

Young v. Woodward Iron Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1927No. 6 Div. 456PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The case was submitted to the jury under the second count of the complaint, charging that defendants’ servants or agents, “after becoming aware of the peril of plaintiff’s intestate being injured by said collision, negligently failed to use all of the means at their command to avoid said collision, when by the use of said means said collision would have been avoided and intestate’s death would have been prevented.”

The burden, therefore, was on plaintiff to show that a servant of the defendant corporation, in service on its train on this occasion, discovered that plaintiff’s intestate was in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Anniston Electric & Gas Co. v. RosenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Birmingham & A. Ry. Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. DrakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MoranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Gulf, M. O. R. Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Trimble v. Bramco Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Zemczonek v. McElroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FrenchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API