Legal Opinion
Parham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided June 29, 1971No. 6 Div. 169PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
Robbery: sentence, ten years. The .State failed to appear at argument and .submitted without filing a brief.
For prior proceedings see Parham v. State, 285 Ala. 334, 231 So.2d 899 wherein it was said:
“* * * pER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the denial by the circuit court of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the defendant, Parham.
“In substance, his petition alleged that he had been brought to trial upon an indictment for robbery and that a mistrial had been erroneously declared by the trial judge, thus placing him in jeopardy, and thereby acquitting him.
“Petitioner…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- State ex rel. Hovey v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ex Parte Flexible Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Clements v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Crouch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Billups v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.