Turner v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Presiding Judge.
Robbery 1 : sentence, ten years in the penitentiary.
I
We conclude that the State adduced sufficient evidence to sustain the indictment, if credited by the jury to the required degree, i. e.,' beyond a reasonable doubt.
The verdict reflects this convincement and implicitly is a rejection of Turner’s claim of alibi.
II
On this appeal it is argued that there was a separation of the jury to the hurt of the appellant. We have searched the record as required under Code 1940, T. 15, § 389. We find no ruling on this point raised in the trial court. Compare Pitts v. State, 53…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Douglass v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Thompson v. Magic City Trucking ServiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Golden v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Murrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Rieber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Rowe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.