Legal Opinion

Vorous v. Cochran

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 10, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

QUILLEN, Judge.

The plaintiff, Richard Vorous, instituted this action to seek recovery for injuries sustained by him on October 29, 1967, when he fell from a tree located on defendants’ property.

Vorous, a tree surgeon with seven years experience, had come onto defendants’ property pursuant to an agreement between himself and defendant husband, in which he agreed to “trim and top” two trees. The trees were in poor condition and at least certain portions of the trees were decayed.

On October 29, 1967, Vorous, furnishing his own equipment,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kowalsky v. Conreco CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Fahey v. SayerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. White v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
  4. Baum v. RowlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Garofoli v. Salesianum School, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hite v. Maritime Overseas CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1974
  2. Seeney v. Dover Country Club Apartments, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API