Legal Opinion

Coghill v. National Council on Compensation Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 1998No. INS 93-09-026; CA A96550PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Petitioner seeks reconsideration of our decision in Coghill v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 155 Or App 601, 964 P2d 1085 (1998),1 in which we upheld a determination that petitioner was required to provide workers’ compensation coverage for certain siding installers in his employ. Petitioner contends that we made a factual error when we stated that “[t]he record before us does not show that installers worked with or for any other parties during the audit period.” We agree with petitioner that there is information in the record to support a finding that the installers worked for other people…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coghill v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Coghill v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DCBS v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. RJ Enterprises LLC v. Department of Consumer & Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API