Legal Opinion

Fara Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Fara Estates, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1998No. 96-17338Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

134 F.3d 377

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

FARA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California non-profit

corporation, individually and in its

representative capacity, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FARA ESTATES, LTD., a limited partnership; Modesto

Development, a general partnership; Modesto Development, a

California corporation; Fara Associates, a general

partnership; Crocker…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Cabrales v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Josefina Cabrales v. County of Los Angeles Ronald Black, Josefina Cabrales, Cross-Appellant v. County of Los Angeles Ronald Black, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API