Legal Opinion

In re Stewart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by Perez M. Stewart and another, petitioners in each of the above-entitled proceedings, from two orders of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 13th day of December, 1897, denying the petitioners’ motion for a peremptory mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

In the proceeding designated as Ho. 1 petitions were presented to the Supreme Court asking that the board of county and city canvassers of the city -and county of Hew York be required to summon the several boards of inspectors of the seventh, eighth, tenth, fourteenth, seventeeth, eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth election districts of the nineteenth Assembly district to appear before the •board of city and county canvassers to make such corrections in the original statements of the voters polled as the facts of the case required, and to cause their canvass of the votes in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. People, Ex Rel. Smith v. . SchielleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. People Ex Rel. Stapleton v. . BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. People Ex Rel. Nostrand v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Application of StilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. MATTER OF RICE v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. MATTER OF RICE v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API