Legal Opinion
State v. Blair
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 2, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peradotto, J.
In this appeal, we are confronted with the issue whether respondent is a detained sex offender within the meaning of Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 (g) (5). Our resolution of the issue requires consideration of the interplay between articles 9 and 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law and the implications of the decisions of the Court of Appeals in State of N.Y. ex rel. Harkavy v Consilvio (7 NY3d 607 [2006] [hereafter, Harkavy /]) and State of N.Y. ex rel. Harkavy v Consilvio (8 NY3d 645 [2007] [hereafter, Harkavy II]). Supreme Court concluded that respondent was not a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Harkavy v. ConsilvioNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Harkavy v. ConsilvioNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People ex rel. Noel B. v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- State ex rel. Karur v. CarmichaelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- State v. Randy M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Andre L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- State v. Larry TT.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- State v. Angel A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010