Legal Opinion
Lagudi v. Long Island Railroad
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 15, 1991No. CV-86-3094, CV-86-4140 and CV-89-3463PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
These three personal injury actions by plaintiff Patrick Lagudi against defendant/third-party plaintiff Long Island Railroad Company (“LIRR”) have been consolidated for trial. LIRR has moved this court for a bifurcation of the trial — with one trial for liability and a second t, :al, if necessary, for damages. Mr. Lagudi opposes the motion; third-party defendant Harold Sawyer has advised the court that he neither supports nor opposes the motion of the defendant. At the time this motion was argued, the trial for these consolidated actions was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- John E. Johnson and H/w Ann Marie Johnson v. The Celotex Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re Master Key Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Simpson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Helminski v. Ayerst LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Evans v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Zofcin v. DeanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992