Legal Opinion
Snarr v. Cento Fine Foods Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 23, 2019No. 4:19-cv-02627Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DEREK SNARR, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02627-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 40 10 CENTO FINE FOODS INC., 11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended 13 Complaint, for which briefing is complete. Dkt. No. 40 (“Mot.”), 45 (“Opp.”), 51 (“Reply”). For 14 the reasons articulated below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 On July 22, 2019, Lead Plaintiffs Derek Snarr, J. Michael Duca, and Candace…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.