Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Hudson
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided October 15, 1954No. 1073PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, Chief Judge.
This action was tried by the Court without a jury. The only evidence introduced at the trial was the deposition of the defendant, Walter Hudson. Having considered the evidence, oral arguments and briefs filed by the respective parties, in compliance with Rule 52 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts, 28 U.S. C.A., the Court finds the facts specially and states separately its conclusions of law thereon as follows:
Facts
1. The plaintiff Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lumber Mutual Casualty Ins. Co. v. StukesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. v. BraxtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Gray v. W. T. Congleton Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Turnage v. State Farmers Mutual Tornado Insurance Co. of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- National Union Indemnity Company v. MiniardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
- American Fire and Casualty Company v. Charles E. (Charley) BramlettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Turnage v. State Farmers Mutual Tornado Insurance Co. of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965