Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. Connolly

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1902No. 1933Published

Error to the District Court of Lake County.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Gunter, J.

Since the filing of the petition for a rehearing the original record, its abstract and the elaborate briefs herein have been with care re-examined. After such reconsideration we see no reason to change the conclusions reached in the former opinion.

If it .be conceded that the motion for a reinstatement of the case, heard and denied by the trial court, March 14, is a motion for a new trial as contemplated by the code section 387, and perforce this section is in the record, without its inclusion in the bill of excep*102tions, which we do not hold, yet this does…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. ForceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  2. Clouser v. RuckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. McKenzie v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  4. Cone v. JacksonColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Joralmon v. McPheeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API