Legal Opinion

Courtney Shoe Co. v. E. W. Curd & Son

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 14, 1911PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Barren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson—

'Reversing.

The Courtney Shoe Company is a wholesale house doing business in St. Louis, Missouri; E. W. Curd & Son are merchants doing business at Cave City, Kentucky. On August 22, 1909, Curd & Son gave W. B. Yater, a traveling salesman of the Courtney Shoe Company, two orders, one for stock shoes amounting to $49.15, the other for sample shoes amounting to $1,772.35, both to he shipped as soon as it could. The order though made on the 22d was dated the 21st, as the 22d was Sunday. It was mailed to the house by the drummer, reaching the house ,on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jordan, Marsh & Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Bauman v. McManusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. MarkertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Manier & Co. v. ApplingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Cheboygan Paper Co. v. Swigart Paper Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ally Cat, LLC v. ChauvinKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Nolin Milling Co. v. White Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice & Light Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Hines v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. New York Canners, Incorporated v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API