Legal Opinion

People v. Schladweiler

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1925No. 16428PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Plaintiff in error was indicted in the criminal court of Cook county for taking indecent liberties with a child under the age of fifteen years, to-wit, of the age of eight years. The indictment consisted of two counts, the first charging indecent liberties, and the second, contributing to the delinquency of said child. On trial before a jury plaintiff in error was found guilty, and he brings the record here for review.

Plaintiff in error contends, first, that the testimony of the complaining witness, Katherine Ereitag, and the other witnesses who were children, was incompetent because these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hoge v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Sokel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. KarpovichIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Waters v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Launius v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF CITY OF DES PLAINESIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. The People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Singh v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  4. People v. MuellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. The People v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API