Legal Opinion

Oregon & Western Colonization Co. v. Strang

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

Defendant Davison demurred to the complaint on the ground that two causes of ac tion are improperly joined in one complaint and on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him. At the beginning of the trial defendant Davison also objected to the introduction of any testimony because the complaint did not state a cause of action against him. The same question was raised in other ways. At the argument in this court defendant Davison waived all assignments of error, except the one based on the second cause of action. It is urged here…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corvallis & Alsea River R. v. Portland E. & E. Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Walker v. HewittOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Knighton v. ChamberlinOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Windle v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hawley & Dodd v. BinghamOregon Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. United States v. FloreaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945
  3. Lingle Water Users' Ass'n v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Evergreen West Business Center, LLC v. EmmertOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Kunzman v. ThorsenOregon Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API