Legal Opinion

United States v. Esther Y. Boyd

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 2, 2000No. 99-10384PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEHER, District Judge:

Appellant Esther Boyd (“Boyd”) appeals from the district court’s order affirming the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed by the magistrate judge. In the magistrate judge’s court, a jury returned a guilty verdict on two counts: 1) assault of a federal employee (18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1) (1999)); and 2) entering a military base in violation of an order barring Boyd from the base (18 U.S.C. § 1382 (1999)). We, too, affirm the judgment holding that the issuance of a violation notice does not trigger the Speedy Trial Act and that there was sufficient evidence to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. John Fife Symington, Iii, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
United States v. Walter R. Tucker, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
United States v. Albert E. Mills. United States of America v. Kenneth B. WonsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.