Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter R. Tucker, III

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1998No. 96-50321PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant Walter R. Tucker, III appeals his jury convictions on seven counts of extortion and two counts of filing a false tax return. Tucker also appeals the twenty-seven month term of imprisonment imposed by the district court. On appeal, Tucker contends that: (1) insufficient evidence exists to support his extortion convictions; (2) the evidence presented by the government proved entrapment as a matter of law; (3) insufficient evidence exists to support his conviction for false statements in his tax return; and (4) the district court erred in believing…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. David Phillip Munoz Bennie E. McGregor Donald L. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Ted Stevenson Angwin and Christine KhamisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Michael Charles JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Jeffrey Lynn FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API