Legal Opinion
Verkouteren v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 6, 1969No. Nos. 20889-20894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*463ON REHEARING EN BANC
Before FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVENTHAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON and ROBB, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc. PER CURIAM:
The court, by a divided vote, reinstates the decision of the panel issued February 6, 1969. The issue is one of local law, and the rule for the future has in any event been specified by the amendments effected by the District of Columbia Revenue Act of 1969, 83 Stat. 176 (1969). While the various issues discussed by counsel in their briefs and argument en bane have been carefully considered, we think the case is an appropriate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Choteau v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Heiner v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Maass v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- General Motors Corp. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Verkouteren v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Virgin Islands Bar Ass'n v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1986
- John H. Verkouteren v. District of Columbia, Herman Oshinsky v. District of Columbia, Mary Oshinsky, William Oshinsky and Clara Sennet, Executors of the Estate of Charles Oshinsky, Deceased v. District of Columbia, William Oshinsky v. District of Columbia, Herman Fenichel v. District of Columbia, Bernard Margolius and Lilyan Margolius v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Edward BrookinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Edward BrookinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971