Legal Opinion
John H. Verkouteren v. District of Columbia, Herman Oshinsky v. District of Columbia, Mary Oshinsky, William Oshinsky and Clara Sennet, Executors of the Estate of Charles Oshinsky, Deceased v. District of Columbia, William Oshinsky v. District of Columbia, Herman Fenichel v. District of Columbia, Bernard Margolius and Lilyan Margolius v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 6, 1971No. 20889-20894Published
1Opinion of the Court
433 F.2d 461
John H. VERKOUTEREN, Petitioner,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.
Herman OSHINSKY, Petitioner,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.
Mary OSHINSKY, William Oshinsky and Clara Sennet, Executors of the Estate of Charles Oshinsky, Deceased, Petitioners,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.
William OSHINSKY, Petitioner,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.
Herman FENICHEL, Petitioner,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.
Bernard MARGOLIUS and Lilyan Margolius, Petitioners,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.
Nos. 20889-20894.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- General Utilities & Operating Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lynch v. HornbySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Choteau v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Heiner v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.