Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Mt. Carmel Medical Center

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 15, 1992No. 92-1141-MLBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BELOT, District Judge.

Before the court are the following pleadings: defendant Physician Staffing Resources, Inc.’s (PSR) motion for summary judgment and memorandum in support (Docs. 76 and 77), plaintiff’s response (Doc. 87), PSR’s reply (Doc. 126), plaintiff’s supplement to its response (Doc. 136) and defendants' second supplemental brief (Doc. 139). The court notes that the pleadings filed at dockets 126, 136 and 139 are not filed in accordance with local rule 206(b). In addition, while PSR’s motion complies with rule 206(e) in that it sets forth twenty-four specific…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Falls v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Johns v. JarrardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Foster v. Bd. of Trustees of Butler Cty. Com. Col.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  5. Krueger ex rel. Krueger v. Mammoth Mountain Ski Area, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Houghland v. GrantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API