Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between R. H. Macy & Co. & National Sleep Products, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 6, 1976PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.
On this appeal, we must decide whether an arbitration clause providing for the submission to arbitration of any dispute pertaining to the performance of a contract is *270sufficiently broad to encompass a claim that the parties have abandoned the contract and, also, the question of the extent of a party’s obligation under the contract.
Petitioner and respondent entered into an agreement in 1949 which provided that respondent was to manufacture mattresses bearing the Macy’s label and petitioner was obligated to purchase its mattress requirements for sale in its New York stores up to "700 Mattresses…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Lehman v. OstrovskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- In Re Arbitration Between Rosenbaum & American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Matter of Kahn (National City Bank)New York Court of Appeals · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Norris v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bowmer v. BowmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re the Estate of CassoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Miner v. WaldenNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- In re the Dissolution of Public Relations Aids, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.