New v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
807 So.2d 52 (2001)
Paul Wayne NEW, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
SC00-1240.
Supreme Court of Florida.
December 6, 2001.
Rehearing Denied February 4, 2002.
Paul W. New, Lake Butler, FL, Petitioner, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, and Trisha E. Meggs, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review the decision in New v. State, 765 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), which certified conflict with the decision in Crawford v. State, 735 So.2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). We have jurisdiction.…
Also in this document: Dissent · Anstead; Dissent · Pariente; Concurrence.
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Fiore v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State v. CallawaySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Burdick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Smiley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.