Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 18, 1988No. Civ. A. 82-73643PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for the death of her husband, Frederick Marshall (“Marshall”), allegedly as a result of exposure to asbestos-containing products. Remaining defendants, The Celotex Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation, Keene Corporation and Pittsburg Corning Corporation, renew a motion for judgment following trial. I have subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Marshall died in 1981 of peritoneal mesothelioma. Plaintiff alleges that his death was the result of exposure to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Burche v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Marshall v. Celotex Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- University System of New Hampshire v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
- 210 East 86th Street Corp. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992