Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. R. Herschel Manufacturing Co.

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided August 7, 1978No. Civ. A3-76-72PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BENSON, Chief Judge.

The above-entitled action arose out of a personal injury claim asserted against plaintiff’s insured by Emanuel Benkendorf. Plaintiff seeks indemnity from defendants for the amount paid by plaintiff in settlement of Benkendorf’s claim against its insured. The matter is before the court on a Rule 56 motion of defendant Dayco Corporation (Dayco) for summary judgment and on the motion of defendant R. Herschel Manufacturing Co. (Herschel) to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), or alternatively for summary judgment.

The court holds there is no genuine issue as to any material…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Sayler v. HolstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Herman v. General Irrigation Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Gary Guillard v. Niagara MacHine & Tool Works, and Third Party v. Gage Tool Company, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  5. Larsen v. Minneapolis Gas CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ebert v. FORT PIERRE MOOSE LODGE 1813South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Heckart v. Viking Exploration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Gerald Heckart and Donald L. Bynon, Guardians of Wilfred L. Baker v. Viking Exploration, Inc., Third-Party and v. Superior Drilling, Inc., a Corporation, and Kenai Drilling, Ltd., a Delaware Corporation, Third-Party AndCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API