Legal Opinion

Sayler v. Holstrom

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1976No. Civ. 9144PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Walter A. Sayler alleges that as a result of a boiler explosion at Dickinson Cheese Co., Inc. on June 20, 1971, he suffers from certain chronic and progressive maladies. At the time of the explosion Dickinson Cheese was a complying employer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act and Say-ler’s injury entitled him to benefits of the Act.

^By complaint dated September 30, 1974, Sayler alleges that J. D. Holstrom in his capacity as employee and agent of the Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company either failed to inspect or negligently inspected the boiler;…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Carver v. GrossmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Busy Bee Buffet, Inc. v. FerrellArizona Supreme Court · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HauglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Layman v. Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Horejsi Ex Rel. Anton v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Conrad v. SuhrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API