Legal Opinion
The University Of Maryland At Baltimore v. Peat, Marwick, Main & Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 22, 1993No. 91-1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
996 F.2d 1534
62 USLW 2028, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8324
The UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT BALTIMORE; Andrew R. Burgess,
M.D.; Sea Quest Inc., for themselves and all others
similarly situated; The School Board of Palm Beach County,
Florida, for themselves and all others similarly situated
v.
PEAT, MARWICK, MAIN & COMPANY
Constance B. Foster, Insurance Commissioner of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as Rehabilitator of
The Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland
Insurance Company, Intervenor
(in District Court),
The University of Maryland at Baltimore; Andrew R. Burgess,
M.D.; Sea Quest, Inc.; and The School Board of Palm…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Mastercard International Inc., Internet Gambling LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001