Legal Opinion
Hidalgo v. Dist. Ct.
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 2007No. 48233PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
173 P.3d 1191 (2007)
Luis HIDALGO III and Anabel Espindola, Petitioners,
v.
The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, In and for the COUNTY OF CLARK, and the Honorable Donald M. Mosley, District Judge, Respondents, and
The State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest.
No. 48233.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
December 27, 2007.
Gentile DePalma, Ltd., Dominic P. Gentile, Las Vegas, for Petitioner Hidalgo.
JoNell Thomas, Las Vegas, for Petitioner Espindola.
Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General, Carson City; David J. Roger, District Attorney, James Tufteland, Chief Deputy District Attorney, and…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. EdelbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Woodruff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Weber v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Redeker v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Wilson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hidalgo v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Hidalgo v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008