Legal Opinion

People v. Vandenbosch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of leaving the scene of an accident without reporting it in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law *885§ 600 (2). We reject his contention that the People failed to lay a proper foundation for the admission of dog tracking evidence. The People presented evidence of the dog’s pedigree, the training of the dog and her handler regarding human scent tracking, and the established record of the dog’s accuracy and reliability. They also showed that the dog was introduced to a site where defendant’s scent was still…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. Centolella, New York County Courts1969
  3. People v. AbdullahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. People v. MuggelbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RorabackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. DIXON, ANTHONY J., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API