Legal Opinion
People v. Centolella
New York County Courts
Decided November 18, 1969PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn J. Walsh, J.
During the course of this trial, a serious question of law has arisen which required a recess of this jury trial to permit its resolution before proceeding to hear any further testimony.
The prosecution has presented some 30 witnesses to establish its contention that the two defendants on trial and two codefendants who have been granted severances for separate reasons, committed an armed robbery in the City of Rome, New York on April 19,1968.
The testimony now sought to be introduced is that of State Trooper Suffolk. Through him, the prosecution seeks to establish the background, training and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- People v. PfanschmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Commonwealth v. LePageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Terrell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. PerrymanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- People v. RorabackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- People v. TunstallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.