Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Cunningham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1919No. 15566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Wilson, J., entered April 17, 1919, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action for equitable relief, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

The appellant claims- a homestead in a small tract of farm land in Thurston county, Washington, on the ground that she has living with her, and under her care and maintenance, a minor son. On the other hand, the respondent contends that the minor is not maintained by the appellant, and that, therefore, the appellant does not bring herself within the purview of the homestead laws .of the state. The trial court held that appellant was not entitled to claim a homestead.

Section 553, Bern. Code, with reference to homesteads, defines “head of the family” as follows:

“The phrase ‘head of the family’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Cochran v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Scott v. LowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Tyson v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  5. Jackson v. BanisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. SeiblyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Florida · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API