Legal Opinion
Ristuccia v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 30, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This is an action of tort brought by the administrator of the estate of Rosaría Ristuccia to recover compensation for her death and conscious suffering as a result of her being struck and knocked down, while crossing a street, by an electric car of the defendant. The defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was denied, but the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The case comes before us on the plaintiff’s exceptions to parts of the charge and on a report by the trial judge containing the following: "I report this case for a determination by the Supreme Judicial Court under the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Whitney v. Wellesley & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Commonwealth v. MeserveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Hicks v. H. B. Church Truck Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Boni v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- McDermott v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kane v. Fields Corner Grille, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Hathaway v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Sooserian v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Nicholson v. BabbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Mansell v. LarsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.