Legal Opinion

Morley v. Dickinson

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Thirteenth District, County of Stanislaus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

Plaintiff filed this bill in equity, alleging that he was surety on a contract for other parties, and judgment was recovered against all the makers thereof, himself included; that execution issued on this judgment, and was levied on sufficient personal property of one of the principals ; that the Sheriff released the property on the giving by the principal of his promissory note ; the Sheriff returned the execution satisfied—stating these facts; and further, that defendants—plaintiffs *563in the execution—have sued out another execution, and are proceeding to levy it on the property of plaintiff…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. OsborneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Wise v. ClapperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Read v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Mulford v. EstudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Mitchell v. Hackett & DickensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API