Legal Opinion

Whelan v. Young

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1892No. 11,667Published

Appeal by the defendants from a decree of the Special Term upon a bill filed to enforce mechanics’ lien. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cox

On the 9th of June, 1888, Hanson C. Walter entered into a written contract with Mrs. Young, the defendant, to build a house for her and complete it by December 1, following, for the sum of $6,063.91, to be paid in eight installments as the work progressed, and the contractor was to forfeit $5 for every day’s delay in completing the house beyond the time agreed on.

Mrs. Young paid six of- the installments, amounting to *52$4,goo, when, on the 17th of December, sixteen days after the house was to have been completed, Walter abandoned the work, leaving the house unfinished and $1,163.91 of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Treusch v. ShryockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Carman v. . McIncrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. Renton v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Dore v. SellersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Henley v. WadsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API