Commonwealth v. Hude
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the lower court improperly permitted the introduction of evidence of crimes unrelated to those listed in the indictments. We agree and, therefore, would grant appellant a new trial.1
On March 7, 1975, appellant was arrested on multiple charges of possessing and delivering marijuana.2 The indict*441ments filed by the Commonwealth specified that appellant sold drugs to a high school student on a number of designated occasions ranging from about November 30, 1974, to about January 1, 1975. At a jury trial on September 19 and 21, 1975, the Commonwealth’s primary…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BurdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. UlatoskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. BondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.