Legal Opinion

Ausman v. Arthur Andersen, LLP

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 18, 2004No. 1-02-3755PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff Susan Ausman, an attorney, appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing her retaliatory discharge action against defendant Arthur Andersen, LLP, for failure to state a claim. On appeal, plaintiff contends that our supreme court’s decision in Balla v. Gambro, Inc., 145 Ill. 2d 492, 584 N.E.2d 104 (1991), did not bar her cause of action. Alternatively, plaintiff argues that Balia should be overruled. For the reason set forth below, we affirm.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On January 8, 2001, plaintiff was employed as an attorney in defendant’s “Legal Group.” After she was summarily…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bryson v. News America Publications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Neade v. PortesIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Board of Directors of Bloomfield Club Recreation Ass'n v. Hoffman Group Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Zimmerman v. Buchheit of Sparta, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Baltimore Police Dept.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  2. Nelson v. Aurora Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Nelson v. Aurora Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Emery v. NE ILL. REGIONAL COMMUTER RRAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API