Legal Opinion

In re Bazzle

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1981No. 21483PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Appellant Margaret Bazzle was adjudicated a delinquent. We reverse.

A hearing was conducted to determine whether or not appellant was delinquent. At.the close of the case, the family court judge refused defense counsel’s request to make a closing argument. Respondent concedes this was reversible error, but proposes the case be remanded only for closing arguments rather than a new trial.

Article I, § 14 of the South Carolina Constitution, as well as the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, *427guarantees an accused the right “to be fully heard in his defense by himself or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BallengerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foreman v. ForemanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API