Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Foreman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 17, 1984No. 0082PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Curéton, Judge:

This is a divorce action. The appellant husband, Lee Foreman, appeals from the order of the family court awarding the respondent-wife, Cathy Foreman, all of the marital property, with minor exceptions, monthly alimony of $200 and attorney’s fees of $1,500. We reverse and remand.

Lee and Cathy Foreman were married on May 10,1975. Mrs. Foreman was employed as a teacher earning approximately $11,000. Mr. Foreman earned around $20,000. They purchased a modest home in January 1976 with joint funds. Title was placed in both their names.

The Foremans’ lives changed considerably when…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Burgess v. BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  5. Barden v. BardenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. County of Richland v. SimpkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Anderson v. BuonforteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Poynter Investments, Inc. v. Century Builders of Piedmont, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API