Foreman v. Foreman
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Curéton, Judge:
This is a divorce action. The appellant husband, Lee Foreman, appeals from the order of the family court awarding the respondent-wife, Cathy Foreman, all of the marital property, with minor exceptions, monthly alimony of $200 and attorney’s fees of $1,500. We reverse and remand.
Lee and Cathy Foreman were married on May 10,1975. Mrs. Foreman was employed as a teacher earning approximately $11,000. Mr. Foreman earned around $20,000. They purchased a modest home in January 1976 with joint funds. Title was placed in both their names.
The Foremans’ lives changed considerably when…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Burgess v. BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- Barden v. BardenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- County of Richland v. SimpkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Anderson v. BuonforteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Poynter Investments, Inc. v. Century Builders of Piedmont, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.