Lb Folding Co. v. Gergel-Kellem Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Porter, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant LB Folding Company, Inc. (“LB”) appeals from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee, Ger-gel-Kellem, Inc., d.b.a. Watt Printing (‘Watt”). LB claims the court erred in holding that the lapse of LB’s security interest in certain machinery operated retroactively, thereby rendering it unperfected as to Watt’s pre-lapse purchase of the secured collateral under R.C. 1309.40(B)(1). LB also argues that the court incorrectly granted summary judgment to Watt on LB’s conversion and execution lien claims. We find no error in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ware v. RicheyOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State Savings Bank of Hornick v. Onawa State Bank of OnawaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Eastern Indiana Production Credit Ass'n v. Farmers State BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- United States v. Central Livestock Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1985
- Growth Properties v. LempertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bank One v. Swartz, Unpublished Decision (4-21-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- BP Communications Alaska, Inc. v. Central Collection AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Mason v. MeyersOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bp Comm. Alaska v. Central CollectionOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- The Four County Bank v. Tidewater Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015