Legal Opinion
United States v. Martin R. Stone, Also Known as Martin R. Schmid
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1987No. 86-1104PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Martin R. Stone appeals from a criminal conviction for theft of govern ment property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 (1982) and for making false statements to the government in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1982). Stone argues that the district court erred in refusing to dismiss his indictment under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161-3174 (1982). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1982), and we affirm.
FACTS:
On September 27, 1985, Stone was charged in a two count indictment with violating 18 U.S.C. § 641 and 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Stone first appeared…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. William Bull Pringle, Iii, United States of America v. James Crawford McAfee United States of America v. Lloyd Cowan ParkerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Harry H. Nance, United States of America v. Leon Stelly, United States of America v. Taybren LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Gary John CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Miguel N. BorrayoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ronnie Joseph BrickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Jesus Landeros MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Wendell WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Herman Campbell Barnett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.