Legal Opinion
United States v. Herman Campbell Barnett, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 18, 1992No. 91-8082PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Herman Campbell Barnett, Jr., was tried by jury and convicted of four armed bank robberies. On this direct appeal, Barnett contends (1) that the government violated the Speedy Trial Act by failing to try him within 90 days of his arrest, see 18 U.S.C. § 3164(b) (1988), and (2) that the district court erroneously refused to instruct the jury on the consequences that would result if the jury were to reach a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict. We find both arguments to be without merit and accordingly AFFIRM.
I
Because Barnett remained in detention subsequent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. James E. McCrackenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Anton Vaughn Evalt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Gary John CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. James NeavillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. James A. Fisher, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. William James Thigpen, United States of America v. Herman Campbell Barnett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Terry Lee ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- U.S. v. ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.