Legal Opinion
Adams & Westlake Co. v. Peter Gray & Sons, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 2, 1913No. 237 (C. C. 824)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Adams & Westlake Company against Peter Cray & Sons, Incorporated. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The hill charges infringement of letters patent No. 651,782, June 12, 1900, to William S. Hamm, for improvement in signal lamps. Claims 1, 2, 5, and 6 are in suit.
"1. The combination, with a lantern, of an annular air-chamber depending thereinto remotely situated with reference to the burner and communicating with the combustion-chamber thereof, the said annular chamber comprising an inner imperforate and an outer perforated air-distributing wall, and being closed at its lower end and provided with air-inlet, openings communicating with the external air, and the central…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Combustion Utilities Corp. v. Worcester Gaslight Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Karl Kiefer Mach. Co. v. Unionwerke, A. G.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914
- Adams & Westlake Co. v. Peter Gray & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1914