Bernard v. Renard
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. Franklin A. Griffin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Joseph E. O’Donnell, Costello & Costello, and E. R. Hoerchner, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is an action to recover a judgment for money alleged to be due as rent under the terms of a written lease, the defendants being the trustees of the creditors of the lessee corporation (a dissolved corporation), and the sureties on the bond given by the lessee for the payment of the stipulated rent and the observance of the other covenants of the lease. The cause was tried with a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiff for seven thousand five hundred dollars. Defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The action was for rents at nine…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Baker v. Eilers Music CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Rehkopf v. WirzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Von Schleinitz v. North Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Dorcich v. Time Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Rognier v. HarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Signal Management Corp. v. LambNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.